Bunce, C;
Quartilho, A;
Freemantle, N;
Doré, CJ;
Ophthalmic Statistics Group;
(2016)
Ophthalmic statistics note 8: missing data - exploring the unknown.
[Editorial comment].
British Journal of Ophthalmology
, 100
(3)
pp. 291-294.
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307821.
Preview |
Text
Freemantle_missing data CJD_AQ_CJD NF.pdf Download (328kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Medical research is conducted to answer uncertainties and to identify effective treatments for patients. Different questions are best addressed by different types of study design—but the randomised, controlled clinical trial is typically viewed as the gold standard, providing a very high level of evidence, when examining efficacy. While clinical trial methodology has advanced considerably with clear guidance provided as to how to avoid sources of bias, even the most robustly designed study can succumb to missing data. In this statistics note, we discuss strategies for dealing with missing data but what we hope emerges is a very clear message that there is no ideal solution to missing data and prevention is the best strategy.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
