UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A scoping review identified additional considerations for defining estimands in cluster randomised trials

Bi, Dongquan; Copas, Andrew; Li, Fan; Kahan, Brennan C; (2025) A scoping review identified additional considerations for defining estimands in cluster randomised trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , Article 112015. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.112015. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S1071916425004312-main.pdf]
Preview
PDF
1-s2.0-S1071916425004312-main.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An estimand is a clear description of the treatment effect a study aims to quantify. The ICH E9(R1) addendum lists five attributes that should be described when defining an estimand. However, the addendum was primarily developed for individually randomised trials. Cluster randomised trials (CRTs), in which groups of individuals are randomised, have additional considerations for defining estimands, such as the population of clusters and how individuals and clusters are weighted. We aimed to identify a list of additional items that may need to be considered when defining estimands in CRTs. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a systematic search of multiple databases as well as the authors' personal libraries to identify articles that described an aspect of an estimand definition for CRTs which was not explicitly covered by one of the five attributes listed in the ICH E9 (R1) addendum. From this, we generated a list of items that may require consideration when defining estimands for CRTs beyond the five attributes listed in the ICH E9(R1) addendum. RESULTS: From 46 eligible articles, we identified 8 items that may need to be considered when defining estimands in CRTs: (i) population of clusters; (ii) population of individuals under selection bias; (iii) exposure time of individuals/clusters on treatment; (iv) how individuals and clusters are weighted (e.g. individual-average vs. cluster-average); (v) whether summary measures are marginal or cluster-specific; (vi) strategies used to handle cluster-level intercurrent events; (vii) how interference/spillover is handled; and (viii) how individuals who leave or change clusters are handled. CONCLUSION: This review has identified additional items that may need to be considered when defining estimands for CRTs. Study investigators undertaking CRTs should consider these items when defining estimands for their trials, to ensure estimands are unambiguous and relevant for end-users such as clinicians, patients, and policy makers.

Type: Article
Title: A scoping review identified additional considerations for defining estimands in cluster randomised trials
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.112015
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.112015
Language: English
Additional information: © 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Keywords: Estimand, ICH E9(R1), cluster randomised trial, intercurrent event, scoping review
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Inst of Clinical Trials and Methodology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute for Global Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Inst of Clinical Trials and Methodology > MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10215932
Downloads since deposit
1Download
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item