UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Gender-Equity Model for Liver Allocation using Artificial Intelligence (GEMA-AI) for waiting list liver transplant prioritization

Gómez-Orellana, Antonio Manuel; Rodríguez-Perálvarez, Manuel Luis; Guijo-Rubio, David; Gutiérrez, Pedro Antonio; Majumdar, Avik; McCaughan, Geoffrey W; Taylor, Rhiannon; ... Hervás-Martínez, César; + view all (2025) Gender-Equity Model for Liver Allocation using Artificial Intelligence (GEMA-AI) for waiting list liver transplant prioritization. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.010. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Gomez-Orellana GEMA-AI CGH 2025.pdf]
Preview
Text
Gomez-Orellana GEMA-AI CGH 2025.pdf - Published Version

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence score (GEMA-AI) to predict liver transplant (LT) waiting list outcomes using the same input variables contained in existing models. METHODS: Cohort study including adult LT candidates enlisted in the United Kingdom (2010-2020) for model training and internal validation, and in Australia (1998-2020) for external validation. GEMA-AI combined international normalized ratio, bilirubin, sodium, and the Royal Free Glomerular Filtration Rate in an explainable Artificial Neural Network. GEMA-AI was compared with GEMA-Na, MELD 3.0, and MELD-Na for waiting list prioritization. RESULTS: The study included 9,320 patients: training cohort n=5,762, internal validation cohort n=1,920, and external validation cohort n=1,638. The prevalence of 90-days mortality or delisting for sickness ranged 5.3%-6% across different cohorts. GEMA-AI showed better discrimination than GEMA-Na, MELD-Na and MELD 3.0 in the internal and external validation cohorts, with a more pronounced benefit in women and in patients showing at least one extreme analytical value. Accounting for identical input variables, the transition from a linear to a non-linear score (from GEMA-Na to GEMA-AI) resulted in a differential prioritization of 6.4% of patients within the first 90 days and would potentially save one in 59 deaths overall, and one in 13 deaths among women. Results did not substantially change when ascites was not included in the models. CONCLUSIONS: The use of explainable machine learning models may be preferred over conventional regression-based models for waiting list prioritization in LT. GEMA-AI made more accurate predictions of waiting list outcomes, particularly for the sickest patients.

Type: Article
Title: Gender-Equity Model for Liver Allocation using Artificial Intelligence (GEMA-AI) for waiting list liver transplant prioritization
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.010
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.010
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Artificial Neural Networks, Disparities, Gender, Liver Allocation, Machine Learning, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Medicine
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Medicine > Inst for Liver and Digestive Hlth
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10204496
Downloads since deposit
Loading...
3Downloads
Download activity - last month
Loading...
Download activity - last 12 months
Loading...
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Loading...

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item