Jones, E; Gould, A; Pillay, TD; Khorasanee, R; Sykes, R; Bazo-Alvarez, JC; Cox, C; ... Khaliq, W; + view all Jones, E; Gould, A; Pillay, TD; Khorasanee, R; Sykes, R; Bazo-Alvarez, JC; Cox, C; Shurovi, B; Isted, A; Simpson, T; Jennings, M; Breeze, R; Khaliq, W; - view fewer (2020) Subcutaneous Emphysema, Pneumomediastinum, and Pneumothorax in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Critical Care Explorations , 2 (9) , Article e0210. 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000210.

Preview

PDF subcutaneous_emphysema,_pneumomediastinum,_and.16.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Importance: Management of severe coronavirus disease 2019 relies on advanced respiratory support modalities including invasive mechanical ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, and noninvasive ventilation, all of which are associated with the development of subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, and pneumothorax (herein collectively termed barotrauma). Objectives: To assess the occurrence rate of barotrauma in severe coronavirus disease 2019 and to explore possible associated factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, single-center cohort study with nested case series, conducted at University Hospital Lewisham: a 450-bed general hospital in London, United Kingdom. All patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the critical care department from March 12, to April 12, 2020, were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients were retrospectively screened for radiological evidence of barotrauma. Admission characteristics, modalities of respiratory support, and outcomes were compared between barotrauma and nonbarotrauma groups. Respiratory parameters in the period preceding barotrauma identification were recorded. Results: Of 83 admissions with coronavirus disease 2019, eight suffered barotrauma (occurrence rate 9.6%; 95% CI 4.3%-18.1%). Barotrauma cases had longer illness duration prior to critical care admission (10 vs 7 d; interquartile range, 8-14 and 6-10, respectively; p = 0.073) and were more often treated with continuous positive airway pressure or noninvasive ventilation as the initial modality of advanced respiratory support (87.5% vs 36.0%; p = 0.007). Patients managed with continuous positive airway pressure or noninvasive ventilation prior to the development of barotrauma had median minute ventilation of 16.2-19.9 and 21.3-22.7 L/min, respectively. Compared with the nonbarotrauma group, a higher proportion of patients with barotrauma had died (62.5% vs 43.2%), and a lower proportion of patients had been discharged (25.0% vs 53.3%) at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: Barotrauma appears to be a common complication of severe coronavirus disease 2019. Determining whether high minute ventilation while using continuous positive airway pressure or noninvasive ventilation predisposes patients to barotrauma requires further investigation.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Archive Staff Only

View Item