UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

What is a significant departure from the norm? Assessing the inherent distinctiveness of 3D shape marks

Fhima, Ilanah; (2022) What is a significant departure from the norm? Assessing the inherent distinctiveness of 3D shape marks. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice , 17 (12) pp. 993-1010. 10.1093/jiplp/jpac101. Green open access

[thumbnail of JIPLP norms test - final.pdf]
Preview
Text
JIPLP norms test - final.pdf - Other

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

This article considers the implementation of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 European Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR)1 as it applies to shape marks. In order for any trade mark to be registered, it must not be ‘devoid of distinctive character’. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has stated that the test for inherent distinctiveness is the same for all forms of marks. While maintaining this position in relation to shape marks, it has also been said that for such marks to be registered they must depart significantly from the norm in the sector concerned. There has been much discussion of whether the shape mark test is in fact stricter than that applied for other forms of marks. However, this article also examines the issue from a different angle, asking how this ‘norms test’, which the CJEU has never explained, is implemented in practice. In particular, it identifies and critiques a body of practice on the part of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in conducting internet searches to identify ‘the norms’ and comparing the mark in question to those norms and suggests how this practice could be improved.

Type: Article
Title: What is a significant departure from the norm? Assessing the inherent distinctiveness of 3D shape marks
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac101
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac101
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10162129
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item