UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized studies: quantitative bias analysis in health technology assessment

Leahy, Thomas P; Kent, Seamus; Sammon, Cormac; Groenwold, Rolf HH; Grieve, Richard; Ramagopalan, Sreeram; Gomes, Manuel; (2022) Unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized studies: quantitative bias analysis in health technology assessment. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 10.2217/cer-2022-0029. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Gomes_Unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized studies_AOP.pdf]
Preview
Text
Gomes_Unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized studies_AOP.pdf

Download (865kB) | Preview

Abstract

Evidence generated from nonrandomized studies (NRS) is increasingly submitted to health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. Unmeasured confounding is a primary concern with this type of evidence, as it may result in biased treatment effect estimates, which has led to much criticism of NRS by HTA agencies. Quantitative bias analyses are a group of methods that have been developed in the epidemiological literature to quantify the impact of unmeasured confounding and adjust effect estimates from NRS. Key considerations for application in HTA proposed in this article reflect the need to balance methodological complexity with ease of application and interpretation, and the need to ensure the methods fit within the existing frameworks used to assess nonrandomized evidence by HTA bodies.

Type: Article
Title: Unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized studies: quantitative bias analysis in health technology assessment
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2022-0029
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2022-0029
Language: English
Additional information: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords: Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Health Care Sciences & Services, HTA, nonrandomized, quantitative bias analysis, unmeasured confounding, BAYESIAN SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS, EXTERNAL ADJUSTMENT, IMPACT, FORMULAS, OUTCOMES, MODEL
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Applied Health Research
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10150914
Downloads since deposit
133Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item