Bikakis, A; Cohen, A; Dvorák, W; Flouris, G; Parsons, S; (2021) Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks. Journal of Applied Logics , 8 (6) pp. 1437-1501.

Preview

Text Chapter02_Bikakis_etal.pdf - Accepted Version Download (727kB) | Preview

Abstract

While modelling arguments, it is often useful to represent “joint attacks”, i.e., cases where multiple arguments jointly attack another (note that this is different from the case where multiple arguments attack another in isolation). Based on this remark, the notion of joint attacks has been proposed as a useful extension of classical Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, and has been shown to constitute a genuine extension in terms of expressive power. In this chapter, we review various works considering the notion of joint attacks from various perspectives, including abstract and structured frameworks. Moreover, we present results detailing the relation among frameworks with joint attacks and classical argumentation frameworks, computational aspects, and applications of joint attacks. Last but not least, we propose a roadmap for future research on the subject, identifying gaps in current research and important research directions.

Download activity - last month

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as CSVJSONXML

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Archive Staff Only

View Item