Polberg, S;
Hunter, A;
Thimm, M;
(2017)
Belief in attacks in epistemic probabilistic argumentation.
In:
Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
(pp. pp. 223-236).
Springer, Cham
Preview |
Text
probattack.pdf - Accepted Version Download (242kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The epistemic approach to probabilistic argumentation assigns belief to arguments. This is valuable in dialogical argumentation where one agent can model the beliefs another agent has in the arguments and this can be harnessed to make strategic choices of arguments to present. In this paper, we extend this epistemic approach by also representing the belief in attacks. We investigate properties of this proposal and compare it to the constellations approach showing neither subsumes the other.
| Type: | Proceedings paper |
|---|---|
| Title: | Belief in attacks in epistemic probabilistic argumentation |
| Event: | 11th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2017) |
| ISBN-13: | 9783319675817 |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_16 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_16 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| Keywords: | Abstract argumentation, Probabilistic argumentation, Epistemic argumentation |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Computer Science |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10038952 |
Loading...
Loading...Loading...Loading...Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
