UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks

Wilson, PM; Petticrew, M; Calnan, MW; Nazareth, I; (2010) Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks. Implementation Science , 5 , Article 91. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-91. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1748-5908-5-91.pdf]
Preview
PDF
1748-5908-5-91.pdf

Download (447kB)
[thumbnail of Additional file 1:  Appendix 1: Database search strategies] MS Word (Additional file 1: Appendix 1: Database search strategies)
1748-5908-5-91-s1.doc

Download (39kB)
[thumbnail of Additional file 2:  Appendix 2: Full-text papers assessed for eligibility but excluded from the review] MS Word (Additional file 2: Appendix 2: Full-text papers assessed for eligibility but excluded from the review)
1748-5908-5-91-s2.doc

Download (53kB)

Abstract

Background: Addressing deficiencies in the dissemination and transfer of research-based knowledge into routine clinical practice is high on the policy agenda both in the UK and internationally. However, there is lack of clarity between funding agencies as to what represents dissemination. Moreover, the expectations and guidance provided to researchers vary from one agency to another. Against this background, we performed a systematic scoping to identify and describe any conceptual/organising frameworks that could be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activity.Methods: We searched twelve electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO), the reference lists of included studies and of individual funding agency websites to identify potential studies for inclusion. To be included, papers had to present an explicit framework or plan either designed for use by researchers or that could be used to guide dissemination activity. Papers which mentioned dissemination (but did not provide any detail) in the context of a wider knowledge translation framework, were excluded. References were screened independently by at least two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by discussion. For each included paper, the source, the date of publication, a description of the main elements of the framework, and whether there was any implicit/explicit reference to theory were extracted. A narrative synthesis was undertaken.Results: Thirty-three frameworks met our inclusion criteria, 20 of which were designed to be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activities. Twenty-eight included frameworks were underpinned at least in part by one or more of three different theoretical approaches, namely persuasive communication, diffusion of innovations theory, and social marketing.Conclusions: There are currently a number of theoretically-informed frameworks available to researchers that can be used to help guide their dissemination planning and activity. Given the current emphasis on enhancing the uptake of knowledge about the effects of interventions into routine practice, funders could consider encouraging researchers to adopt a theoretically-informed approach to their research dissemination.

Type: Article
Title: Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-91
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-91
Language: English
Additional information: © 2010 Wilson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Knowledge translation, diffusion, policy, communication, organizations, university, programs, exchange, sciences, promote
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Primary Care and Population Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/375114
Downloads since deposit
290Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item