McCulloch, SP;
Reiss, MJ;
(2017)
Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Culling in England: An Animal Rights-Based Analysis of Policy Options.
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
10.1007/s10806-017-9685-4.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
McCulloch & Reiss 2017 JAGE Bovine TB and badgers - Animal rights.pdf - Published Version Download (458kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis (bovine TB) is an important and controversial animal health policy issue in England, which impacts humans, cattle and badgers. The government policy of badger culling has led to widespread opposition, in part due to the conclusions of a large field trial recommending against culling, and in part because badgers are a cherished wildlife species. Animal rights (AR) theorists argue that sentient nonhumans should be accorded fundamental rights against killing and suffering. In bovine TB policy, however, pro-culling actors claim that badgers must be culled to avoid the slaughter of cattle. The first part of the paper compares AR theories of Regan, Francione, Cochrane, Garner and Donaldson and Kymlicka in the context of wildlife species. The second part of the paper applies these AR theories to bovine TB and badger control. AR theories are applied to badger control policy options of (1) do nothing, (2) badger culling, and (3) badger vaccination. We conclude that AR theories are strongly opposed to badger culling. In general, culling is prohibited due to a badger’s right to life and its rights against suffering. The AR theories support a do-nothing, i.e. non-culling, non-vaccination approach to badger control. In the case of the AR theories of Regan and Francione, this is based on abolitionist positions with respect to farming. For Cochrane, Garner, and Donaldson and Kymlicka, the do-nothing policy option is preferred because badger vaccination causes a degree of suffering which generally is not for the individual’s benefit.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Culling in England: An Animal Rights-Based Analysis of Policy Options |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10806-017-9685-4 |
| Publisher version: | http://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9685-4 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | © The Author(s) 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
| Keywords: | Animal health and welfare policy; Animal rights; Badger culling; Badger vaccination; Bovine tuberculosis; Ethical analysis |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1571909 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
