Raffe, S;
Curtis, H;
Tookey, P;
Peters, H;
Freedman, A;
Gilleece, Y;
Sullivan, A;
... British HIV Association Audit and Standards Sub-Committee, .; + view all
(2017)
UK national clinical audit: Management of pregnancies in women with HIV.
BMC Infectious Diseases
, 17
(1)
, Article 158. 10.1186/s12879-017-2255-6.
Preview |
Text (Published version of record)
art%3A10.1186%2Fs12879-017-2255-6.pdf - Published Version Download (360kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text (Supplementary file: List of BHIVA Audit participants)
Raffe_UK_national_clinical_audit_Suppl.pdf Download (219kB) | Preview |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential for HIV transmission between a pregnant woman and her unborn child was first recognized in 1982. Since then a complex package of measures to reduce risk has been developed. This project aims to review UK management of HIV in pregnancy as part of the British HIV Association (BHIVA) audit programme. METHODS: The National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood (NSHPC), a population-based surveillance study, provided data for pregnancies with an expected delivery date from 1/1/13 - 30/6/14. Services also completed a survey on local management policies. Data were audited against the 2012 BHIVA pregnancy guidelines. RESULTS: During the audit period 1483 pregnancies were reported and 112 services completed the survey. Use of dedicated multidisciplinary teams was reported by 99% although 26% included neither a specialist midwife nor nurse. 17% of services reported delays >1 week for HIV specialist review of women diagnosed antenatally. Problematic urgent HIV testing had been experienced by 9% of services although in a further 49% the need for urgent testing had not arisen. Delays of >2 h in obtaining urgent results were common. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was started during pregnancy in 37% women with >94% regimens in accordance with guidelines. Late ART initiation was common, particularly in those with a low CD4 count or high viral load. Eleven percent of services reported local policy contrary to guidelines regarding delivery mode for women with a VL <50 copies/mL at ≥36 weeks. According to NSHPC reports 27% of women virologically eligible for vaginal delivery planned to deliver by CS. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women in the UK are managed largely in accordance with BHIVA guidelines. Improvements are needed to ensure timely referral and ART initiation to ensure the best possible outcomes.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | UK national clinical audit: Management of pregnancies in women with HIV |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12879-017-2255-6 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2255-6 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
Keywords: | HIV; Mother to child transmission; Vertical transmission |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute for Global Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute for Global Health > Infection and Population Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1544203 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |