Man, J;
Hutchinson, JC;
Ashworth, M;
Heazell, AE;
Levine, S;
Sebire, NJ;
(2016)
Effects of intrauterine retention and postmortem interval on body weight following intrauterine death: implications for assessment of fetal growth restriction at autopsy.
Ultrasound In Obstetrics & Gynecology
, 48
(5)
pp. 574-578.
10.1002/uog.16018.
Preview |
Text
Sebire_effects of intrauetrine retention_fetal growth.pdf - Accepted Version Download (520kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective According to the classification system used, 15–60% of stillbirths remain unexplained, despite undergoing recommended autopsy examination, with variable attribution of fetal growth restriction (FGR) as a cause of death. Distinguishing small-for-gestational age (SGA) from pathological FGR is a challenge at postmortem examination. This study uses data from a large, well-characterized series of intrauterine death autopsies to investigate the effects of secondary changes such as fetal maceration, intrauterine retention and postmortem interval on body weight. Methods Autopsy findings from intrauterine death investigations (2005–2013 inclusive, from Great Ormond Street Hospital and St George's Hospital, London) were collated into a research database. Growth charts published by the World Health Organization were used to determine normal expected weight centiles for fetuses born ≥ 24 weeks' gestation, and the effects of intrauterine retention (maceration) and postmortem interval were calculated. Results There were 1064 intrauterine deaths, including 533 stillbirths ≥ 24 weeks' gestation with a recorded birth weight. Of these, 192 (36%) had an unadjusted birth weight below the 10th centile and were defined as SGA. The majority (86%) of stillborn SGA fetuses demonstrated some degree of maceration, indicating a significant period of intrauterine retention after death. A significantly greater proportion of macerated fetuses were present in the SGA population compared with the non-SGA population (P = 0.01). There was a significant relationship between increasing intrauterine retention interval and both more severe maceration and reduction in birth weight (P < 0.0001 for both), with an average artifactual reduction in birth weight of around −0.8 SD of expected weight. There was an average 12% reduction in fetal weight between delivery and autopsy and, as postmortem interval increased, fetal weight loss increased (P = 0.0001). Conclusion Based on birth weight alone, 36% of stillbirths are classified as SGA. However, fetuses lose weight in utero with increasing intrauterine retention and continue to lose weight between delivery and autopsy, resulting in erroneous overestimation of FGR.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Effects of intrauterine retention and postmortem interval on body weight following intrauterine death: implications for assessment of fetal growth restriction at autopsy |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1002/uog.16018 |
Publisher version: | http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.16018 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Man, J; Hutchinson, JC; Ashworth, M; Heazell, AE; Levine, S; Sebire, NJ; (2016) Effects of intrauterine retention and postmortem interval on body weight following intrauterine death: implications for assessment of fetal growth restriction at autopsy. Ultrasound In Obstetrics & Gynecology , 48 (5) pp. 574-578, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.16018. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. |
Keywords: | Birth weight; intrauterine death; maceration; postmortem interval; retention |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1535892 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |