Renzi, C;
              
      
            
                Lyratzopoulos, G;
              
      
            
                Card, T;
              
      
            
                Chu, TPC;
              
      
            
                Macleod, U;
              
      
            
                Rachet, B;
              
      
        
        
  
(2016)
  Do colorectal cancer patients diagnosed as an emergency differ from non-emergency patients in their consultation patterns and symptoms? A longitudinal data-linkage study in England.
British Journal of Cancer
, 115
       (7)
    
     pp. 866-875.
    
         10.1038/bjc.2016.250.
  
  
      
    
  
Preview  | 
            
              
Text
 bjc2016250a.pdf Download (836kB) | Preview  | 
          
Abstract
Background: More than 20% of colorectal cancers are diagnosed following an emergency presentation. We aimed to examine pre-diagnostic primary-care consultations and related symptoms comparing patients diagnosed as emergencies with those diagnosed through non-emergency routes. Methods: Cohort study of colorectal cancers diagnosed in England 2005 and 2006 using cancer registration data individually linked to primary-care data (CPRD/GPRD), allowing a detailed analysis of clinical information referring to the 5-year pre-diagnostic period. Results: Emergency diagnosis occurred in 35% and 15% of the 1029 colon and 577 rectal cancers. ‘Background’ primary-care consultations (2–5 years before diagnosis) were similar for either group. In the year before diagnosis, >95% of emergency and non-emergency presenters had consulted their doctor, but emergency presenters had less frequently relevant symptoms (colon cancer: 48% vs 71% (P<0.001); rectal cancer: 49% vs 61% (P=0.043)). ‘Alarm’ symptoms were recorded less frequently in emergency presenters (e.g., rectal bleeding: 9 vs 24% (P=0.002)). However, about 1/5 of emergency presenters (18 and 23% for colon and rectal cancers) had ‘alarm’ symptoms the year before diagnosis. Conclusions: Emergency presenters have similar ‘background’ consultation history as non-emergency presenters. Their tumours seem associated with less typical symptoms, however opportunities for earlier diagnosis might be present in a fifth of them.
| Type: | Article | 
|---|---|
| Title: | Do colorectal cancer patients diagnosed as an emergency differ from non-emergency patients in their consultation patterns and symptoms? A longitudinal data-linkage study in England | 
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery | 
| DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.2016.250 | 
| Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.250 | 
| Language: | English | 
| Additional information: | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | 
| Keywords: | Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Oncology, symptomatic presentations, primary care, emergency diagnosis, colorectal cancer, data-linkage study, COLON-CANCER, LUNG-CANCER, HEALTH-CARE, INEQUALITIES, ADMISSION, EXPERIENCE, MORTALITY, SURVIVAL, ROUTES, COHORT | 
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health  | 
        
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1508635 | 
Archive Staff Only
![]()  | 
        View Item | 
                      
