Davies, R;
Carrasco, R;
Foster, HE;
Baildam, EM;
Chieng, ASE;
Davidson, JE;
Ioannou, Y;
... Hyrich, KL; + view all
(2016)
Treatment prescribing patterns in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): Analysis from the UK Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS).
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
, 46
pp. 190-195.
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.06.001.
Preview |
Text
Wedderburn_1-s2.0-S0049017216300683-main.pdf - Published Version Download (354kB) | Preview |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Initial treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is largely based on the extent of joint involvement, disease severity and ILAR category. The licensing of biologic therapies for JIA has expanded treatment options. The aims of the study are (1) to describe treatment prescribing patterns in JIA over the first 3 years following first presentation to paediatric rheumatology and (2) to determine whether patterns of treatment have changed as biologics have become more widely available. METHODS: Children with at least 3 years of follow-up within the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS) were included. For analysis, children were placed into one of five groups according to their initial presentation to paediatric rheumatology: oligoarthritis (oJIA), polyarthritis (pJIA), systemic (sJIA), enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Treatment patterns over 3 years were described. RESULTS: Of 1051 children, 58% received synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (sDMARD) and 20% received biologics over the 3 years. Use of sDMARDs and biologics was higher in more severe disease presentations (sJIA and pJIA); however, 35% and 10% who presented with oJIA were also treated with sDMARDs and biologics, respectively. The number of children receiving sDMARD after 2006 was higher (p = 0.02); however, there was no difference in biologic prescribing before and after 2006 (p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of children presenting with JIA received sDMARDs plus/minus biologics during 3 years of follow-up. This was most common for patients with severe JIA but was also prescribed for patients with oligoarticular disease, despite the lack of evidence for effectiveness in this category.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Treatment prescribing patterns in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): Analysis from the UK Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS) |
Event: | Annual Meeting of the British-Society-for-Rheumatology and British-Health-Professionals-in-Rheumatology |
Location: | Manchester, ENGLAND |
Dates: | 28 April 2015 - 30 April 2015 |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.06.001 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.06.001 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Keywords: | Juvenile idiopathic arthritis; Biologic therapy; DMARD therapy; Treatment |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Medicine UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Dept |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1506419 |




Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |