UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Theoretical basis and explanation for the relationship between area-level social inequalities and population oral health outcomes - A scoping review

Singh, A; Harford, J; Schuch, HS; Watt, RG; Peres, MA; (2016) Theoretical basis and explanation for the relationship between area-level social inequalities and population oral health outcomes - A scoping review. SSM - Population Health , 2 pp. 451-462. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.06.001. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S2352827316300301-main.pdf]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S2352827316300301-main.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

This study was conducted to review the evidence on the association between area-level social inequalities and population oral health according to type and extent of social theories. A scoping review was conducted of studies, which assessed the association between area-level social inequality measures, and population oral health outcomes including self-rated oral health, number of teeth, dental caries, periodontal disease, tooth loss, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and dental pain. A search strategy was applied to identify evidence on PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, Web of Science, ERIC, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, references of selected studies, and further grey literature. A qualitative content analysis of the selected studies was conducted to identify theories and categorize studies according to their theoretical basis. A total of 2892 studies were identified with 16 included in the review. Seven types of social theories were used on 48 occasions within the selected studies including: psychosocial (n=13), behavioural (n=10), neo-material (n=10), social capital (n=6), social cohesion (n=4), material (n=3) and social support (n=2). Of the selected studies, four explicitly tested social theories as pathways from inequalities to population oral health outcomes, three used a theoretical construct, seven used theories for post-hoc explanation and two did not have any use of theory. In conclusion, psychosocial theories were used most frequently. Although theories were often mentioned, majority of these studies did not test a social theory.

Type: Article
Title: Theoretical basis and explanation for the relationship between area-level social inequalities and population oral health outcomes - A scoping review
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.06.001
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.06.001
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Inequality; Theories; Oral health; Social determinants; Review
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Epidemiology and Public Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1505633
Downloads since deposit
85Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item