Paziuc, Cristian; (2016) REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE IN CONTRACT AND ITS FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENTS: A CRITICAL ECONOMIC APPROACH. UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence , 5 (1) , Article 4. 10.14324/111.2052-1871.064.

Preview

Text __ad.ucl.ac.uk_home_ucqhiry_DesktopSettings_Desktop_April issue papers with DOIs_5(1) UCLJLJ 87 Remoteness of Damage.pdf Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Hadley v Baxendale remoteness is generally regarded favourably in the law and economics literature. Orthodox theory views remoteness as an efficient rule, although its purported efficiency virtues vary. Most economic models portray remoteness as an information disclosure device which bridges information asymmetry and regulates rates of contracting, precautions against breach and even reliance by promisees. Yet the assumptions of economic models are denied by the content that courts attribute to the doctrine. This paper suggests that remoteness is an inefficient rule which entails certain costs, particularly through its impact on performance/breach decisions, but only uncertain and modest efficiency gains. It is argued that a more efficient default rule would allow full recovery of expectation damages. The paradigmchanging judgment in The Achilleas could pave the way for such superior rule rather than add an imprecise test of remoteness to the existing Hadley rule. The paper contrasts the English and US solutions with functional equivalents of remoteness from Germany, France and Quebec, which come closer than the common law to the economic models’ version of remoteness or the expectation damages rule. The analysis shows, perhaps surprisingly, that the efficiency of the common law of contract is too often taken for granted.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVJSONXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as CSVJSONXML

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item