Wilson, JGS; (2017) Public value, maximisation and health policy: an examination of Hausman's Restricted Consequentialism. Public Health Ethics , 10 (2) pp. 157-163. 10.1093/phe/phw020.

Preview

Text Hausman paper - revised version for repository.pdf - Accepted Version Download (145kB) | Preview

Abstract

In the book Valuing Health, Daniel Hausman sets out a normative framework for assessing social policy, which he calls restricted consequentialism. For the restricted consequentialist, government policy-making not only is, but ought to be, largely siloed in individual government departments. Each department has its own goal linked to a fundamental public value, which it should pursue in a maximizing way (subject to constraint by other non-consequentialist values). I argue that, first, Hausman’s argument appears to be internally inconsistent: his case for thinking that health policy should default to a form of maximization is plausible only if a much narrower vision of the goals of policy is adopted than Hausman thinks appropriate in the case of education. Secondly, it turns out that none of Hausman’s analysis helps us with the crucial question of how maximization should be constrained by other values—a question that even on Hausman’s account looks to be crucial, and that will be even more important if adopt a broader perspective on the purposes of health policy than Hausman allows.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVJSONXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item