Hinds, KS;
Mackenzie-Davey, K;
(2013)
From accounting to learning in the third sector: the barriers for funders.
Presented at: 8th CMS Conference 2013, Manchester.
Preview |
Text
Hinds_cmsconference paper2.pdf - Accepted Version Download (469kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Traditionally, the funding relationship has been characterized by funders calling agencies to account for the efficiency with which they manage funds. More recently, charitable foundations have called for improvements to the quality of evidence coming from their portfolios and an increase in their use of evidence before funding (e.g. NESTA 2012). This move from an accounting to a learning relationship has proved challenging for funders. Scholars have written about the disappointment of those advocating for greater accountability at the lack of transferable learning generated by accounting processes (Yang 2012, Graefe and Levesque 2010, O’Dwyer and Unerman 2008), despite the reformist promise of continuous improvement leading to change and innovation (Dubnick 2011, Yang 2012). In this paper, we argue that there are three barriers to this move towards an evidence based culture. First, a learning culture requires acknowledgement of failure which risks damage to reputation; secondly, like any change it involves disruption of existing administrative practice; and finally accounting and learning have a shared language that confuses as terms, such as evaluation, have different meanings in the two contexts.
Type: | Conference item (UNSPECIFIED) |
---|---|
Title: | From accounting to learning in the third sector: the barriers for funders |
Event: | 8th CMS Conference 2013 |
Location: | Manchester |
Dates: | 10-12 July 2013 |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | http://www.criticalmanagement.org/content/cms-conf... |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1473787 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |