Belot, M.;
Bhaskar, V.;
van de Ven, J.;
(2006)
Social preferences in the public arena: evidence from a prisoner's dilemma game on a TV show.
(ELSE Working Papers
221).
ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution: London, UK.
Preview |
PDF
14512.pdf Download (239kB) |
Abstract
We analyze a large stakes prisoner's dilemma game played on a TV show. Players cooperate 40% of the time, demonstrating that social preferences are important; however, cooperation is significantly below the 50% threshold that is required for inequity aversion to sustain cooperation. Women cooperate significantly more than men, while players who have "earned" more of the stake cooperate less. A player's promise to cooperate is also a good predictor of his decision. Surprisingly, a player's probability of cooperation is unrelated to the opponent's characteristics or promise. We argue that inequity aversion alone cannot adequately explain these results; reputational concerns in a public setting might be more important.
Type: | Working / discussion paper |
---|---|
Title: | Social preferences in the public arena: evidence from a prisoner's dilemma game on a TV show |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | http://else.econ.ucl.ac.uk/newweb/papers.php#2006 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | C72, C93, D64 |
UCL classification: | UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Economics |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/14512 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |