Cook, LM;
Grant, BS;
Saccheri, IJ;
Mallet, J;
(2012)
Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: the last experiment of Michael Majerus.
Biology Letters
, 8
(4)
609 -612.
10.1098/rsbl.2011.1136.
Preview |
PDF
609.full.pdf Download (198kB) |
Preview |
PDF (Brief history of the peppered moth debacle)
rsbl20111136supp1.pdf Download (76kB) |
Preview |
PDF (Details of Majerus' experimental methods)
rsbl20111136supp2.pdf Download (101kB) |
Preview |
PDF (Statistical analysis details for results in table 2 of the main paper)
rsbl20111136supp3.pdf Download (168kB) |
Abstract
Colour variation in the peppered moth Biston betularia was long accepted to be under strong natural selection. Melanics were believed to be fitter than pale morphs because of lower predation at daytime resting sites on dark, sooty bark. Melanics became common during the industrial revolution, but since 1970 there has been a rapid reversal, assumed to have been caused by predators selecting against melanics resting on today's less sooty bark. Recently, these classical explanations of melanism were attacked, and there has been general scepticism about birds as selective agents. Experiments and observations were accordingly carried out by Michael Majerus to address perceived weaknesses of earlier work. Unfortunately, he did not live to publish the results, which are analysed and presented here by the authors. Majerus released 4864 moths in his six-year experiment, the largest ever attempted for any similar study. There was strong differential bird predation against melanic peppered moths. Daily selection against melanics (s ≃ 0.1) was sufficient in magnitude and direction to explain the recent rapid decline of melanism in post-industrial Britain. These data provide the most direct evidence yet to implicate camouflage and bird predation as the overriding explanation for the rise and fall of melanism in moths.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: the last experiment of Michael Majerus |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1136 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.1136 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Colour variation in the peppered moth Biston betularia was long accepted to be under strong natural selection. Melanics were believed to be fitter than pale morphs because of lower predation at daytime resting sites on dark, sooty bark. Melanics became common during the industrial revolution, but since 1970 there has been a rapid reversal, assumed to have been caused by predators selecting against melanics resting on today's less sooty bark. Recently, these classical explanations of melanism were attacked, and there has been general scepticism about birds as selective agents. Experiments and observations were accordingly carried out by Michael Majerus to address perceived weaknesses of earlier work. Unfortunately, he did not live to publish the results, which are analysed and presented here by the authors. Majerus released 4864 moths in his six-year experiment, the largest ever attempted for any similar study. There was strong differential bird predation against melanic peppered moths. Daily selection against melanics (s ≃ 0.1) was sufficient in magnitude and direction to explain the recent rapid decline of melanism in post-industrial Britain. These data provide the most direct evidence yet to implicate camouflage and bird predation as the overriding explanation for the rise and fall of melanism in moths. PubMed ID: 22319093 |
Keywords: | Natural selection, Cryptic coloration, Ecological genetics, Insectivorous birds, Melanism, Lepidoptera |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences > Div of Biosciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences > Div of Biosciences > Genetics, Evolution and Environment |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1354483 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |