UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

What Decision-Making Processes Are Used by Nurses in Initiating, Monitoring, and Ending One-to-One Observations? A Systematic Review

Stanton, Joel; Stiles, Carol; Anderson, Paula; Taylor, Rachel M; Vindrola-padros, Cecilia; Ivany, Elena; (2026) What Decision-Making Processes Are Used by Nurses in Initiating, Monitoring, and Ending One-to-One Observations? A Systematic Review. Journal of Nursing Care Quality , 41 (1) pp. 42-48. 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000878.

[thumbnail of Vindrola_Decision making review_Accepted Manuscript.pdf] Text
Vindrola_Decision making review_Accepted Manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 11 May 2026.

Download (150kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence-based processes to support nurses in appropriately utilizing one-to-one observations for patients at risk of avoidable harm in acute hospitals. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the decision-making processes surrounding one-to-one observations. METHODS: Five databases were searched in July 2020 and July 2024. Papers were included if they discussed decision-making processes for one-to-one observations for acute adult inpatients. Data were extracted to a review database and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Sixteen publications were included. The decision-making tools described were assessment tools, local processes, and clinical judgement. The most common tool was an institutional decision-making process, which often was a combination of clinical assessment and clinical action guidance. CONCLUSION: Various tools and processes are used to facilitate decision-making on the use of one-to-one observations but few of the tools are evidence-based.

Type: Article
Title: What Decision-Making Processes Are Used by Nurses in Initiating, Monitoring, and Ending One-to-One Observations? A Systematic Review
Location: United States
DOI: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000878
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1097/ncq.0000000000000878
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: clinical decision making, CLOSE OBSERVATION, decision aids, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Nursing, one-to-one observations, patient safety, SAFETY, SCALE, Science & Technology, SITTER-REDUCTION PROGRAM, sitters, systematic review
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci > Department of Targeted Intervention
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10220505
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item