UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

RetBench: Which Ophthalmic Foundation Model Performs Best and Why?

Zou, K; Goh, JHL; Zhou, Y; Yew, SME; Wang, M; Fu, H; Cheng, CY; (2026) RetBench: Which Ophthalmic Foundation Model Performs Best and Why? In: Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis. OMIA 2025. (pp. pp. 75-84). Springer, Cham

[thumbnail of MICCAI25_RetBench___arxiv_.pdf] Text
MICCAI25_RetBench___arxiv_.pdf - Accepted Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 23 November 2026.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Foundation models (FMs) have shown great promise in medical image analysis by improving generalization across diverse downstream tasks. In ophthalmology, several FMs have recently emerged, but there is still no clear answer to a fundamental question: Which FM performs the best? Are they equally good across different tasks? The lack of standardized benchmarks makes it difficult to fairly compare these models. To address this gap, we propose RetBench, a comprehensive evaluation suite covering both ophthalmic disease detection (glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration) and systemic disease prediction (diabetes and hypertension) based on retinal imaging. We benchmarked four state-of-the-art FMs (RETFound, VisionFM, RetiZero, and DINORET) using standardized datasets from multiple countries and evaluated their performance comprehensive metrics. Our results show that DINORET, RetiZero, and RETFound perform similarly across most tasks. We recommend using DINORET as the base model for glaucoma detection. For instance, RetiZero achieved an average AUC of 0.92 on external validation datasets for systemic disease prediction, compared to 0.88 by the next best model, and showed particularly strong generalization in diabetes prediction. These findings provide an evidence-based answer to the above questions and highlight future directions for improving the clinical applicability of ophthalmic foundation models.

Type: Proceedings paper
Title: RetBench: Which Ophthalmic Foundation Model Performs Best and Why?
Event: Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis (OMIA 2025)
ISBN-13: 9783032103505
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-10351-2_8
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10351-2_8
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10220057
Downloads since deposit
1Download
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item