Antalek, Catherine;
Dockrell, Julie E;
Thomas, Michael SC;
Masterman, Thomas;
Gordon, Rebecca;
Marshall, Chloe;
Van Herwegen, Jo;
(2025)
Raising Educational Achievement for Students with Special Educational Needs: Perspectives on Evidence-Based Interventions from Educational Practitioners.
Mind, Brain, and Education
, Article mbe.70019. 10.1111/mbe.70019.
Preview |
PDF
Mind Brain and Education - 2025 - Antalek - Raising Educational Achievement for Students with Special Educational Needs (1).pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Research indicates that evidence-based approaches are most effective in improving educational outcomes for children and young people with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND). However, it is not clear how educators identify and integrate research evidence to guide their intervention approaches, and the extent to which school context (e.g., setting, phase of education, and senior leadership) may influence their decision-making. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 32 primary and secondary educational practitioners from mainstream and specialist provision schools in England. Participants were asked to reflect on the intervention strategies they use to support students with SEND, the factors influencing their selection of intervention approaches, and how they identify, evaluate, and apply evidence to inform their choices and assess effectiveness. School type and education phase impacted intervention choices, with primary and specialist schools favoring flexible approaches with short, frequent sessions. Secondary and mainstream schools, which were often more constrained by cost and resources, prioritized programs requiring minimal staff training. In terms of how practitioners engaged with research to inform their choices, findings revealed that practitioners had limited awareness of key indicators of research reliability, such as rigorous scientific methodologies like randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Instead, most participants relied on personal experience or word of mouth to inform their choices of interventions. Participants preferred designing their own interventions or using flexible, piecemeal approaches rather than manualized programs. These findings highlight current practices and suggest areas for improving SEND support. Practical implications are discussed.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Raising Educational Achievement for Students with Special Educational Needs: Perspectives on Evidence-Based Interventions from Educational Practitioners |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1111/mbe.70019 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.70019 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Keywords: | Social Sciences, Education & Educational Research, Psychology, Developmental, Psychology, TREATMENT INTEGRITY, DECISION-MAKING, TEACHERS, CHILDREN, CAPACITY, BEHAVIOR |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Psychology and Human Development |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10217694 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
