Kuz, Varvara;
Cai, Fangzhou;
Chen, Keyue;
Chen, Jiaxin;
Qi, Xuzi;
Veall, Clement;
Zheng, Yuanqi;
... Santi, Andrea; + view all
(2025)
Further Argumentation for Conflict Adaptation Not Being Domain General: Response to Novick et al.
Languages
, 10
(10)
, Article 262. 10.3390/languages10100262.
Preview |
Text
Santi_Further Argumentation for Conflict Adaptation Not Being Domain General_VoR.pdf Download (252kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We agree with the commentary that discrepant results across cross-task conflict adaptation studies are likely explained by methodological differences. Considering additional studies and paradigms, we argue that, collectively, the weight of the evidence suggests conflict adaptation is domain-specific; the exception being the visual world paradigm. Further argumentation is provided for why the visual world paradigm may in fact be showing domain-specific conflict adaptation within visual attentional control. The additional methodological concerns raised in the commentary about our study either do not appear consistently across all of our experiments or we provide further data or argumentation to demonstrate they are in fact not a concern. Our original article did not claim that cognitive control does not apply in language processing, but that a domain-specific account of cognitive control may be feasible and should be explored in future work.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
