UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Comparative Responsiveness of Preference-Based Health-Related Quality of Life, Social Care and Wellbeing Measures in the Context of Multiple Sclerosis

Goodwin, Elizabeth; Heather, Amy; Morrish, Nia; Freeman, Jenny; Boddy, Kate; Thomas, Sarah; Chataway, Jeremy; ... Hawton, Annie; + view all (2025) Comparative Responsiveness of Preference-Based Health-Related Quality of Life, Social Care and Wellbeing Measures in the Context of Multiple Sclerosis. Value Health 10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.3063. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of PIIS1098301525056207.pdf]
Preview
PDF
PIIS1098301525056207.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide evidence on the responsiveness of social care and wellbeing preference-based measures (PBMs) compared to health-related quality of life PBMs in the context of multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: The ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) and Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) were completed online in September 2019, March 2020, September 2020, via the UK MS Register. Responses were linked to EQ-5D-3L and MS Impact Scale-Eight Dimensions (MSIS-8D) values, and to MS Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) scores. Responsiveness was assessed in relation to minimal important differences on MSWS-12, HADS and FSS between timepoints, using mean change scores, t-tests, standardised effect sizes, standardised response means and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Data from 1,742 people with MS were available for analysis. When using standardised values, MSIS-8D showed the greatest responsiveness and EQ-5D-3L the least. In contrast, when absolute utility values were used, EQ-5D-3L performed similarly to MSIS-8D and better than ICECAP-A and ASCOT. Standardised regression analyses indicated the MSIS-8Ds to be the most responsive, followed by the ASCOT, ICECAP-A, and EQ-5D-3L. CONCLUSIONS: The ICECAP-A, ASCOT and MSIS-8D were more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L in the context of MS when compared using standardised scores. The increased responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L when absolute values were used seems an artefact of the wide-ranging scale of this measure. This illustrates how the maximum potential range of values for a given PBM tariff could influence whether an intervention is found to be cost-effective.

Type: Article
Title: Comparative Responsiveness of Preference-Based Health-Related Quality of Life, Social Care and Wellbeing Measures in the Context of Multiple Sclerosis
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.3063
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.3063
Language: English
Additional information: © 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Keywords: EQ-5D, Health-related quality of life measures, Preference-based measures, QALY measures, Responsiveness, Social care related quality of life measures, Wellbeing measures
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10215937
Downloads since deposit
1Download
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item