UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Surgical Settings: A Systematic Review

Aylmore, H; Agarwal, S; Marcus, HJ; Pandit, AS; (2025) Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Surgical Settings: A Systematic Review. Annals of Surgery 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006736. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Aylmore_cognitive_biases_and_heuristics_in_surgical.1271.pdf]
Preview
Text
Aylmore_cognitive_biases_and_heuristics_in_surgical.1271.pdf

Download (703kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify cognitive biases and heuristics experienced by surgeons in operative settings and the impact these biases and heuristics have on patient care. / Summary Background Data: Cognitive biases and heuristics are systematic errors in thinking that can affect clinical decisions. Both are noted in surgical settings and are a risk to patient safety. / Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registered (CRD42023432099). Five major databases were searched from inception to 28th August 2022, with an updated search on 27th January 2024. Original primary research studies in English were included, with relevant risk of bias tools employed for each study. / Results: 21 papers were included. 38 biases were identified across six experiments, five analyses, and ten survey studies. Confirmation bias, anchoring, risk aversion, and overconfidence bias were the most represented. Risk of bias was moderate across most studies. Cognitive biases and heuristics were found to influence surgical outcomes and six studies cited a negative impact on patient care, with one associating biases with fatal outcomes. / Conclusion: Biases and heuristics contribute to surgical errors and never events, and will continue to do so until they are recognised and addressed. Implementing debiasing strategies, such as mindfulness training and deliberate reflection, was found to reduce surgical errors in two studies. This review highlights the need for experimental studies, which are essential for understanding how and why biases lead to negative outcomes and for evaluating further debiasing interventions. We propose directions for future research and system changes.

Type: Article
Title: Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Surgical Settings: A Systematic Review
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006736
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006736
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Developmental Neurosciences Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10213465
Downloads since deposit
5Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item