Chen, Haojie;
Zhang, Tong;
Costanza, Robert;
Kubiszewski, Ida;
Sloggy, Matthew R;
Wu, Luhua;
Luo, Haohan;
(2025)
Assessing individual and social values of cultural services of a protected area through online deliberation.
Ecological Economics
, 235
, Article 108632. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108632.
Preview |
Text
Chen et al_online deliberation 2025.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The non-material benefits obtained through interaction with nature are known as cultural services. We employed an online survey to value cultural services provided by the Fanjing Mountain National Nature Reserve, China. The valuation combined a stated-preference approach with online deliberation, where participants considered and discussed the services through typing in chat groups. The services perceived by most participants, in descending order, were spiritual experiences, recreation, aesthetic appreciation, education, and scientific value. In two hypothetical scenarios, where participants were assumed to be potential visitors and local staff (tour guides), respectively, they expressed both individual and social preferences for cultural services. Individual preferences primarily represented their own interests without necessarily or explicitly considering social benefits, whereas social preferences explicitly considered what was right or desirable for society. Overall, the social preferences were lower, more converged, and less affected by demographic variables (e.g., income) than the individual preferences in both scenarios. However, such differences between individual and social preferences were not always statistically significant. Moreover, participants valued cultural services significantly higher as potential tour guides than as visitors, as their psychological states, substitutes for cultural services, prior rights to the services, and certainty in interacting with nature varied with their stakeholder roles.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Assessing individual and social values of cultural services of a protected area through online deliberation |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108632 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108632 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Cultural ecosystem services, Ecosystem service valuation, Deliberative valuation, Deliberative monetary valuation, Fair price, Public participation, Tourism |
Keywords: | Science & Technology, Social Sciences, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Ecology, Economics, Environmental Sciences, Environmental Studies, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, Business & Economics, Cultural ecosystem services, Ecosystem service valuation, Deliberative valuation, Deliberative monetary valuation, Fair price, Public participation, Tourism, WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY, DEMOCRATIC MONETARY VALUATION, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, HYPOTHETICAL BIAS, INTERNET SKILLS, NATIONAL-PARKS, SHARED VALUES, CHOICE, IMPACT, DISCUSSIONS |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > UCL Institute for Global Prosperity |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10213157 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |