UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Good Learners Are Poor Monitors: A Negative Relation Between Learning Ability and Monitoring Accuracy

Hu, Mengqi; Zhao, Wenbo; Li, Anran; Shanks, David R; Yu, Yadi; Tian, Xiaofang; Liu, Muyi; ... Yang, Chunliang; + view all (2025) Good Learners Are Poor Monitors: A Negative Relation Between Learning Ability and Monitoring Accuracy. Psychological Science 10.1177/09567976251358838. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Shanks_Hu et al. (Psych Sci).pdf]
Preview
Text
Shanks_Hu et al. (Psych Sci).pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Effective learning involves not only the ability to quickly acquire knowledge and skills, but also the capacity to accurately monitor one's ongoing learning progress. The present research probed the relation between learning ability and monitoring accuracy. A meta-analysis (Study 1, N = 2,406) counterintuitively found that individuals with superior learning ability exhibited slightly poorer monitoring accuracy (measured as the resolution of judgments of learning). Study 2 reanalyzed the meta-analysis data and observed that expert learners remembered more items they erroneously believed they would not remember, and this underconfidence in expert learners led to a negative association between learning ability and monitoring accuracy. Studies 3 (N = 102, adults aged 18-23) and 4 (N = 481, adults aged 18-59) conceptually replicated the findings of Studies 1 and 2 in controlled experiments. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom that good learners are also good monitors, suggesting instead that expert learners are actually the ones with monitoring deficits.

Type: Article
Title: Good Learners Are Poor Monitors: A Negative Relation Between Learning Ability and Monitoring Accuracy
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/09567976251358838
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976251358838
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: expert underconfidence, judgments of learning, learning ability, meta-analysis, monitoring accuracy
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10212711
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item