Wood, Lisa; Morrison, Anthony P; Birken, Mary; Dare, Ceri; Guerin, Ella; Nyikavaranda, Patrick; Malde-Shah, Nira; ... Johnson, Sonia; + view all Wood, Lisa; Morrison, Anthony P; Birken, Mary; Dare, Ceri; Guerin, Ella; Nyikavaranda, Patrick; Malde-Shah, Nira; Persaud, Karen; Ford, Panarai; Nebo, Cyntheia; Clarke, Caroline S; Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor; Greenwood, Kathryn; Lewis, Glyn; Lay, Barbara; MacLennan, Graeme; Morant, Nicola; Nolan, Fiona; Pinfold, Vanessa; Christiansen, Colette; Williams, Claire; Johnson, Sonia; - view fewer (2025) Examining the feasibility of a crisis-focused Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT)–informed psychological intervention for inpatients experiencing psychosis (the CRISIS study): results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. eClinicalMedicine , 86 , Article 103380. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103380.

Preview

Text Wood_1-s2.0-S2589537025003128-main.pdf Download (577kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is a psychological intervention that should be offered in the acute phase of psychosis. However, there is little evidence to guide its delivery. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a crisis-focused CBTp-informed intervention (cCBTp) with inpatients. The intervention was co-produced with a stakeholder group. // Methods: Participants were included if they were experiencing psychosis and receiving care from a psychiatric inpatient service at the time of consent. We aimed to recruit n = 60 inpatients and randomise them on a 1:1 ratio to either receive cCBTp plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Follow-ups were conducted at 2, 6, and 12 months. An average of 6–8 sessions of the intervention were offered. The primary objective was to examine indicators of feasibility (recruitment, data collection rates, intervention delivery). The study was prospectively registered (ISRCTN59055607) and is now complete. // Findings: Between 1st February 2021 and 28th February 2022, 145 participants were referred to the study and 52 participants were randomised (during the COVID-19 pandemic). 26 were randomly allocated to cCBTp and 26 to TAU. We were able to recruit 87% of our target sample size. The face-to-face data collection rate (measures of symptoms, recovery, quality of life and service use) was 58% at 2 months and 60% at 6 months, which was below the proposed feasibility threshold. Collection of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data (relapse, rehospitalisation, and adverse events) was at 86% at 6 months and 83% at 12 months. Nine (35%) participants in the cCBTp arm and n = 7 (27%) in the TAU arm had an adverse or serious adverse event. None were assessed as related to participation in the intervention or the trial. // Interpretation: This study demonstrated that a pilot RCT of cCBTp was feasible with inpatients experiencing psychosis. A further large-scale fully powered trial is required to evaluate its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, including modified strategies for follow-up data collection. // Funding: This research was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (ICA-CL-2018-04-ST2-013).

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONCSVXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item