UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Automating International Human Rights Adjudication

Fikfak, Veronika; Helfer, Laurence R; (2025) Automating International Human Rights Adjudication. Michigan Journal of International Law , 46 (1) , Article 69. 10.36642/mjil.46.1.automating. Green open access

[thumbnail of Automating International Human Rights Adjudication.pdf]
Preview
Text
Automating International Human Rights Adjudication.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (784kB) | Preview

Abstract

International human rights courts and treaty bodies are increasingly turning to automated decision-making (“ADM”) technologies to expedite and enhance their review of individual complaints. These tribunals have yet to consider many of the legal, normative, and practical issues raised by the use of different types of automation technologies for these purposes. This article offers a comprehensive and balanced assessment of the benefits and challenges of introducing ADM into international human rights adjudication. We argue in favor of using ADM to digitize documents and for internal case management purposes and to make straightforward recommendations regarding registration, inadmissibility, and the calculation of damages. In contrast, we reject the use of algorithms or artificial intelligence (“AI”) to predict whether a state has violated a human rights treaty. In between these polar categories we discuss semi-automated programs that cluster similar cases together, summarize and translate key texts, and recommend relevant precedents. We weigh the benefits of introducing these tools to improve international human rights adjudication—which include greater speed and efficiency in processing and sorting cases, identifying patterns in jurisprudence, and enabling judges and staff to focus on more complex responsibilities— against two types of cognitive biases—biases inherent in the datasets on which ADM is trained and biases arising from interactions between humans and machines. We also introduce a framework for enhancing the accountability that mitigates the potential harms caused by ADM technologies.

Type: Article
Title: Automating International Human Rights Adjudication
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.36642/mjil.46.1.automating
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.36642/mjil.46.1.automating
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Political Science
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10211347
Downloads since deposit
4Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item