UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Is Covert Retrieval an Effective Learning Strategy? Is It as Effective as Overt Retrieval? Answers from a Meta-Analytic Review

Yu, Yadi; Zhao, Wenbo; Li, Anran; Shanks, David R; Hu, Xiao; Luo, Liang; Yang, Chunliang; (2025) Is Covert Retrieval an Effective Learning Strategy? Is It as Effective as Overt Retrieval? Answers from a Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review , 37 , Article 52. 10.1007/s10648-025-10024-4.

[thumbnail of Shanks_Manuscript_final_Covert retrieval_Meta-analysis.pdf] Text
Shanks_Manuscript_final_Covert retrieval_Meta-analysis.pdf
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 25 May 2026.

Download (2MB)

Abstract

Retrieval practice is well-established as a powerful tool for reinforcing long-term learning. Most previous research has concentrated on the effectiveness of overt retrieval, involving recalling information from memory and generating overt responses by writing, typing, or speaking aloud the retrieved information. Here we ask whether covert retrieval, involving mentally retrieving information without producing overt responses, can enhance learning and consolidate long-term memory, and whether it does so as effectively as overt retrieval. The current meta-analysis integrated data from 2560 participants across 18 studies to investigate the magnitude, boundary conditions, and underlying mechanisms of the covert retrieval effect and the relative efficacy of overt and covert retrieval. The results showed that covert retrieval enhances learning to a small but significant extent (g = 0.23), and its effectiveness is moderated by several factors including provision of corrective feedback, control strategy, and retention interval. The results support the additional exposure and desirable difficulty theories to jointly account for the covert retrieval effect. The meta-analysis also found that overt retrieval is more effective than covert retrieval (g = 0.17), with the effect size of this additional benefit being moderated by the mode by which covert retrieval is performed. The results support the truncated search and desirable difficulty explanations of the relative benefit of overt compared to covert retrieval. Overall, the documented findings provide practical implications for optimizing learning and teaching practices and highlight several important directions for future research.

Type: Article
Title: Is Covert Retrieval an Effective Learning Strategy? Is It as Effective as Overt Retrieval? Answers from a Meta-Analytic Review
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-10024-4
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10024-4
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Covert retrieval; Overt retrieval; Retrieval practice effect; Additional exposure; Desirable difficulty; Truncated search
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10209574
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item