UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Metaphysical Equivalence: How formal concepts of theory equivalence inform metaphysical debates

Schobinger, Timo; (2025) Metaphysical Equivalence: How formal concepts of theory equivalence inform metaphysical debates. Masters thesis (M.Phil.Stud), UCL (University College London). Green open access

[thumbnail of mphil_thesis_timo_schobinger.pdf]
Preview
Text
mphil_thesis_timo_schobinger.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (425kB) | Preview

Abstract

Concepts of theoretical equivalence aim to capture what it means that theories “say the same thing” or “have the same” content. In the context of formal theories, there are precise formal concepts that explicate ways in which formalized theories are equivalent. Based on notions of definition and translation, these concept formulate what it means that the structure of a theory is preserved in another, either in its entirety or in parts. These concepts vary in strength and differ on which parts of the theoretical structure is understood as invariant between equivalent theories. This thesis investigates how formal concepts of theoretical equivalence can be used to investigate disagreements in metaphysics. The thesis does three things. It first motivates the role for a concept of metaphysical equivalence, i.e. a concept of theory equivalence applicable to metaphysics. Second, it presents formal notions of theory equivalence that characterise relations between formal theories. Third, it argues that formal equivalence constrains the metaphysical commitments of theories – realist interpretation cannot rely on the assumption that theories have a metaphysically privileged linguistic expression. Formal equivalence relation here are the basis for explicating a realist understanding of the language independence of ontological commitments.

Type: Thesis (Masters)
Qualification: M.Phil.Stud
Title: Metaphysical Equivalence: How formal concepts of theory equivalence inform metaphysical debates
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © The Author 2025. Original content in this thesis is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Any third-party copyright material present remains the property of its respective owner(s) and is licensed under its existing terms. Access may initially be restricted at the author’s request.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Dept of Philosophy
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10209117
Downloads since deposit
29Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item