UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The Power of Placebo to Restore Neurological Function After Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Neuromodulation

McDougall, Jessica; Cragg, Jacquelyn J; Brownstone, Robert M; Kramer, John LK; (2025) The Power of Placebo to Restore Neurological Function After Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Neuromodulation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 10.1177/15459683251335331. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Brownstone_The Power of Placebo to Restore Neurological Function After Spinal Cord Injury_AAM.pdf]
Preview
Text
Brownstone_The Power of Placebo to Restore Neurological Function After Spinal Cord Injury_AAM.pdf

Download (181kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emerging trials demonstrate that neuromodulation, especially spinal cord stimulation, improves function for those with chronic spinal cord injury. Their design - uncontrolled and unblinded - is justified by the claim that sham conditions are unethical and/or impossible. In the absence of controlled trials, the functional benefits of spinal cord stimulation cannot be distinguished from the effects of placebo. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the validity of the claim that placebo control conditions are infeasible in spinal cord stimulation research, and to propose feasible solutions for including sham conditions that would account for placebo effects. RESULTS: Placebo effects are likely to occur in spinal cord stimulation studies, given the high levels of participant expectations of an effect, natural fluctuations in symptoms associated with spinal cord injury, regression towards the mean, the Hawthorne effect, presence of concurrent interventions, and the absence of blinding in existing studies. Options for placebo control conditions could include adding an "untreated" control group, using "placebo-resistant" outcomes, adding an active comparator group or sham stimulation, or investing in parasthesia-free stimulation. Additionally, wherever feasible, blinding of both participants and assessors should be pursued. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence base for spinal cord stimulation is undermined by the lack of rigorous sham controls, and the argument that such controls are unethical or unfeasible do not withstand scrutiny. We propose strategies for the inclusion of placebo controls in future trials and encourage investigators to prioritize these approaches to ensure the true benefit of spinal cord stimulation can be determined.

Type: Article
Title: The Power of Placebo to Restore Neurological Function After Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Neuromodulation
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/15459683251335331
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251335331
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Keywords: clinical trials, neuromodulation, placebo, randomized clinical trials, research design, spinal cord injury
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Department of Neuromuscular Diseases
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10208612
Downloads since deposit
26Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item