UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Patient Acceptance and Adherence to the COMPASS Trial Drug Recommendations Following Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy

Baker, Daryll; Cruddas, Lucinda; Eveson, Tom; Bakhai, Ameet; Penge, Justin; (2024) Patient Acceptance and Adherence to the COMPASS Trial Drug Recommendations Following Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy. Annals of Vascular Surgery , 108 pp. 403-409. 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.05.018. Green open access

[thumbnail of 2024 042 COMPASS paper  PIIS0890509624003996.pdf]
Preview
PDF
2024 042 COMPASS paper PIIS0890509624003996.pdf - Published Version

Download (293kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COMPASS trial demonstrated that in patients with atherosclerotic diseases, low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin provides greater protection against subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) than mono-antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) alone. Drug acceptance and adherence maximizes this benefit. We have assessed drug acceptance and adherence to the COMPASS drug regime in patients following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Following CEA, the views of 63 patients on the COMPASS drug regime were assessed using the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire and drug adherence was determined using the Sidorkiewicz scoring system. These views were compared with those of 54 patients on MAPT. Side effects (bleeding and drug reactions) and new MACE were recorded. RESULTS: Post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen had strong positive views on the necessity to take these drugs (necessity scale 19.6 ± 3.6). Although there were some concerns about the COMPASS drug regimen, these were not strongly held (concern cscale 11.8 ± 4.9) and the necessity–concerns differential was positive (7.8 ± 6.2). The Drug Adherence Score was “High” to “Good” (level of drug adherence 1.7 ± 1.0). The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire scales and Drug Adherence Score of post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen were similar to those on MAPT. The incidence of post-CEA MACE and side effects were similar for those on the COMPASS drug regimen and MAPT. CONCLUSIONS: Post-CEA patients on the COMPASS drug regimen had positive views on taking the drugs and drug adherence was high. We did not identify any patient-related barriers to the use of the COMPASS drug regimen to further reduce cardiovascular events.

Type: Article
Title: Patient Acceptance and Adherence to the COMPASS Trial Drug Recommendations Following Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy
Location: Netherlands
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.05.018
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.05.018
Language: English
Additional information: © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. under the Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci > Department of Surgical Biotechnology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10208097
Downloads since deposit
10Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item