Silva, Raisa Lomanto;
Carpio Tumba, Manuel;
Gupta, Sneha;
Louden, Diana;
Gupta, Latika;
Machado, Pedro M;
Paik, Julie J;
... Saygin, Didem; + view all
(2025)
Racial, Ethnic, Sex, and Geographical Diversity in Myositis Clinical Trials.
Arthritis Care & Research
10.1002/acr.25525.
(In press).
![[thumbnail of Arthritis Care Research - 2025 - Silva - Racial Ethnic Sex and Geographical Diversity in Myositis Clinical Trials.pdf]](https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Arthritis Care Research - 2025 - Silva - Racial Ethnic Sex and Geographical Diversity in Myositis Clinical Trials.pdf - Accepted Version Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 19 March 2026. Download (1MB) |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) has grown exponentially over the last decade. Race, ethnicity, and sex reporting and representation of participants and the geographic distribution of enrolling sites in IIM RCTs are unknown. This information can provide critical insights into the current state of enrollment practices and generalizability in IIM trials. METHODS: A systematic literature review assessed IIM RCTs published between 2010-2023. Sex/gender reporting was analyzed per SAGER guidelines. Appropriate reporting of race and ethnicity was defined as reporting them for all trial participants. Countries were categorized based on the Human Development Index. U.S. enrollment sites were grouped using the Urban-Rural Classification Scheme and Medically Underserved Areas (MUA). RESULTS: Of the 19 RCTs included, race was appropriately reported in 58%. Black, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino participants represented 3%, 7%, and 2% of the enrollees, respectively. Ethnicity was only reported in 26% of RCTs and 16% conflated race and ethnicity. Temporal trends showed encouraging results for race/ethnicity representation. Most trials (90%) had greater than 45% female participants. Geographic regions of sites included North America, Europe, Asia, and Australasia, with no sites in South America or Africa. The majority of U.S. sites were located in large metropolitan areas, while none were in non-metropolitan areas and only 31% in medically underserved areas. CONCLUSION: Racial, ethnic, and geographic representation in IIM RCTs remains a critical issue. Inadequate reporting of race and ethnicity and limited sociodemographic and geographic representation of participants raise concerns about the generalizability of findings of IIM RCTs.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
