Popa, Teodora;
Davis, Colin;
Xanthopoulou, Leoni;
Bakosi, Evangelia;
He, Chloe;
O’Neill, Helen;
Ottolini, Christian;
(2025)
Current quantitative methodologies for pre-implantation genetic testing frequently misclassify meiotic aneuploidies as mosaic.
Fertility and Sterility
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.02.018.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
PIIS0015028225001013-2.pdf - Accepted Version Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective To study the biological origin of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos reported as mosaic following next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and to assess the accuracy of current NGS-based methods in distinguishing meiotic from mitotic errors. Design Retrospective cohort study utilizing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and Karyomapping to identify meiotic aneuploidy in clinically reported mosaic embryos. Subjects A total of 146 embryos from 87 patients who underwent IVF cycles with NGS-based PGT-A between 2018 and 2020 at The Evewell, London, UK. Exposure Embryos underwent clinical NGS-based PGT-A to identify chromosomal abnormalities. Haplotype-based methods such as SNP-based genotyping and Karyomapping were performed on the same amplified material used for NGS-based PGT-A to determine the origin of the chromosomal errors. Main Outcome Measures The proportion of embryos reported as mosaic by NGS that contained meiotic errors, and the distribution of meiotic versus mitotic origin among chromosomal abnormalities identified in the mosaic range. Results Of the 141 embryos identified as mosaic following NGS-based PGT-A, 32.6% (n=46/141) contained an error of meiotic origin, challenging their classification as ‘mosaic embryos’. In total, 191 individual chromosomal errors were reported in the mosaic range by NGS-based PGT-A. Of those, 29.3% (56/191) errors (both below and above the 50% copy number threshold) were found to be of meiotic origin. The majority (94.6%) of meiotic errors were maternal in origin. Embryos with multiple chromosomal abnormalities were significantly more likely to have at least one meiotic error. Higher intermediate copy number values correlated with an increased probability of an error being of meiotic origin. Conclusion This study presents the first direct evidence that a third of embryos reported as mosaic (both low- and high-level mosaic) by NGS-based PGT-A contain meiotic errors, highlighting the potential misclassification of aneuploid embryos as mosaic by current NGS-based PGT-A methods which cannot accurately distinguishing between meiotic and mitotic errors. SNP genotyping provides essential information for accurately determining the origin of chromosomal abnormalities and should be integrated with NGS-based copy number analysis to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further studies are needed to refine mosaicism classification and to better understand its true implications in IVF treatment.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Current quantitative methodologies for pre-implantation genetic testing frequently misclassify meiotic aneuploidies as mosaic |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.02.018 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.02.018 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | Under a Creative Commons license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Keywords: | PGT-A, NGS, mosaicism, SNP, Karyomapping |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health > Reproductive Health |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10206073 |
Loading...
Loading...Loading...Loading...Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
