Cavaliere, Giulia;
(2024)
Fertility treatment, valuable life projects and social norms: In defence of defending (reproductive) preferences.
Bioethics
, 38
(7)
pp. 600-608.
10.1111/bioe.13194.
Preview |
Text
Cavaliere_Bioethics - 2023 - Cavaliere - Fertility treatment valuable life projects and social norms In defence of defending .pdf Download (816kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Fertility treatment enables involuntary childless people to have genetically related children, something that, for many, is a valuable life project. In this paper, I respond to two sets of objections that have been raised against expanding state-funded fertility treatment provision for existing treatments, such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF), and against funding new treatments, such as uterine transplantation (UTx). Following McTernan, I refer to the first set of objections as the ‘one good among many’ objection. It purports that it is unjustifiable for the state to prioritise the funding of the life project of becoming a parent through fertility treatment provision over the funding of other life projects that people might have. Following Lotz, I refer to the second set of objections as the ‘norm-legitimation’ objection. It maintains that the provision of costly forms of fertility treatment, such as UTx, would legitimise problematic social norms concerning genetic relatedness, reproduction and parenting, and that states should not engage in such a legitimation. In response to these objections, I defend the view that (reproductive) preferences ought to be taken more seriously when discussing fertility treatment provision and parental projects, and that not doing so can be costly, especially for women. The approach defended in this paper seeks to avoid disregarding and policing preferences and to reconcile their fulfilment with political projects aimed at improving the material and social conditions of sub-fertile people: people who, for social or biological reasons (or an intersection of the two), are unable to reproduce unassisted.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Fertility treatment, valuable life projects and social norms: In defence of defending (reproductive) preferences |
| Location: | England |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1111/bioe.13194 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13194 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | © 2023 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Keywords: | fertility treatment provision, genetic relatedness, infertility, IVF, reproductive decisions, uterine transplantation |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Dept of Philosophy |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10205236 |
Loading...
Loading...Loading...Loading...Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
