UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Ibandronate Compared With Single-Dose Radiotherapy for Localized Metastatic Bone Pain in Prostate Cancer

Hoskin, Peter; Sundar, Santhanam; Reczko, Krystyna; Forsyth, Sharon; Mithal, Natasha; Sizer, Bruce; Bloomfield, David; ... Hackshaw, Allan; + view all (2015) A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Ibandronate Compared With Single-Dose Radiotherapy for Localized Metastatic Bone Pain in Prostate Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute , 107 (10) , Article djv197. 10.1093/jnci/djv197. Green open access

[thumbnail of Hackshaw_Hoskin 14-0207 trk chg 1.pdf]
Preview
Text
Hackshaw_Hoskin 14-0207 trk chg 1.pdf

Download (460kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: The radiotherapy or ibandronate (RIB) trial was a randomized multicenter nonblind two-arm trial to compare intravenous ibandronate given as a single infusion with single-dose radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain. // Methods: Four hundred seventy prostate cancer patients with metastatic bone pain who were suitable for local radiotherapy were randomly assigned to radiotherapy (single dose, 8 Gy) or intravenous infusion of ibandronate (6mg) in a noninferiority trial. Pain was measured using the Brief Pain Inventory at baseline and four, eight, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. Pain response was assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and the Effective Analgesic Score (EAS); the maximum allowable difference was ±15%. Patients failing to respond at four weeks were offered retreatment with the alternative treatment. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed at baseline and four and 12 weeks. Because the trial was designed with a 5% one-sided test, we provide 90% confidence intervals (two-sided) for differences in pain response. // Results: Overall, pain response was not statistically different at four or 12 weeks (WHO: −3.7%, 90% confidence interval [CI] = −12.4% to 5.0%; and 6.7%, 90% CI = −2.6 to 16.0%, respectively). Corresponding differences using the EAS were −7.5% and −3.5%. However, a more rapid initial response with radiotherapy was observed. There was no overall difference in toxicity, although each treatment had different side effects. QoL was similar at four and 12 weeks. Overall survival was similar between the two groups but was better among patients having retreatment than those who did not. // Conclusions: A single infusion of ibandronate had outcomes similar to a single dose of radiotherapy for metastatic prostate bone pain. Ibandronate could be considered when radiotherapy is not available.

Type: Article
Title: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Ibandronate Compared With Single-Dose Radiotherapy for Localized Metastatic Bone Pain in Prostate Cancer
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv197
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv197
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Cancer Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Cancer Institute > CRUK Cancer Trials Centre
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10204827
Downloads since deposit
6Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item