McTernan, Emily;
(2024)
In defence of taking offence: a reply to critics.
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
10.1080/13698230.2024.2424004.
(In press).
Preview |
PDF
In defence of taking offence a reply to critics-2.pdf - Published Version Download (541kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article replies to the insightful contributions to the book symposium for On Taking Offence, These range from theoretical questions about how we should conceptualise an emotion like offence and the role of empirical evidence when justifying it, to practical questions about who has the power to take offence effectively and how to dispute another's offence-taking. In this reply, I first defend offence as a distinct emotion. Second, I argue against the implicit conception of social standing that underpins some of these challenges, as static and fixed rather than dynamic, emerging from the particularities of particular social interactions, and easily threatened. Third, I address the instrumental justification of offence. I conclude with some unanswered questions, and some reasons to remain optimistic about what taking offence can do.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | In defence of taking offence: a reply to critics |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1080/13698230.2024.2424004 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2024.2424004 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
Keywords: | Cancel culture; social standing; anger; offence; emotion |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Political Science |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10199660 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |