UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Development and early Evaluation of a novel tool for assessment of individualised risk tolerance during surgical consent

Booker, James; Penn, Jack; Newall, Nicola; Rowland, David; Sinha, Siddharth; Marcus, Hani J; (2024) Development and early Evaluation of a novel tool for assessment of individualised risk tolerance during surgical consent. British Journal of Neurosurgery pp. 1-6. 10.1080/02688697.2024.2413453. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Consent.pdf]
Preview
Text
Consent.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: The legal interpretation of consent has transitioned over the last decade. Surgeons must identify what patients value to individualise surgical consent. This presents a considerable challenge during busy ward rounds or outpatient clinics. We aimed to develop and evaluate a novel risk tolerance tool to aid surgical consent. METHODS: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study evaluated the views of adult, elective surgical patients from a single centre. Attitudes to the existing surgical consent process were assessed (n = 48) and responses underwent thematic analysis. From these responses and a stakeholder focus group, a novel risk tolerance tool was developed. The risk tool was evaluated using questionnaires in 25 pre-operative patients. Post-operatively, the same cohort were followed-up with a telephone clinic 6–8 weeks after discharge. RESULTS: Overall patients were satisfied with the current consent process, but negative themes emerged including that it is generalised, impersonal, and time pressured. The developed risk tool contained six domains: death, pain, loss of physical function, loss of cognitive function, need for repeat medical interventions, and social disability. Loss of physical function (mean = 34.0, SD = 12.8) and loss of cognitive function (mean = 34.0, SD = 6.1) had lowest risk tolerance, and need for repeat medical interventions (mean = 18.8, SD = 10.9) had the highest risk tolerance. Thirteen (93%) patients had a positive experience of the consent process vs 85% of patients in pre-consent tool cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The tool demonstrated good patient acceptability and patient reported experience. The tool gathered data that may enhance understanding of patient risk tolerance and personalise the surgical consent process.

Type: Article
Title: Development and early Evaluation of a novel tool for assessment of individualised risk tolerance during surgical consent
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2024.2413453
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2024.2413453
Language: English
Additional information: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Consent, litigation, risk, surgery
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Med Phys and Biomedical Eng
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10198695
Downloads since deposit
4Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item