UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

EU Competition Law as Responsive Law

Makris, Stavros; (2021) EU Competition Law as Responsive Law. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies , 23 pp. 228-268. 10.1017/cel.2021.9. Green open access

[thumbnail of Makris_SM_EU Competition Law as RespL_Final Cut.pdf]
Preview
Text
Makris_SM_EU Competition Law as RespL_Final Cut.pdf

Download (596kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article proposes two broad ways to conceptualise EU competition law. EU competition law could be viewed as ‘autonomous law’ (‘AL’), namely as a closed normative system a technocratic tool consisting in a set of rules that prohibit undue restraints of trade. Or, EU competition law could be viewed as ‘responsive law’ (‘RL’), namely as a relatively open normative system and an interpretive practice that oscillates between openness and integrity. The responsiveness approach offers a compelling conceptualisation as it explains certain endogenous features of EU competition law: its fuzzy mandate, conceptually elastic vocabulary, and use of rules and standards. In addition, the responsiveness approach can clarify the role economics plays in EU competition law. It views economics as an ‘ideological science’, which, even though it cannot insulate this legal field from value disagreements and make it ‘autonomous’, it can provide a source for positive and normative interpretive statements. On this basis the responsiveness approach maintains that EU competition law is by design open—ie conceptually elastic and factually sensitive—and that its openness can enhance, but also undermine its integrity—ie its capacity to realise its objective in a rule of law compatible manner. These conflicts between openness and integrity are the cause of EU competition law's relative indeterminacy. To deal with the problem of indeterminacy, the RL approach proposes a tripartite legal-institutional modus operandi consisting in constructive interpretation, responsive enforcement, and catalytic adjudication. Hence, considering EU competition law as a form of responsive law has three major implications: first, it offers a new way for understanding how this legal field works and changes; second, it suggests a strategy for dealing with EU competition law's indeterminacy, and third it proposes a new framing for the discursive practices of EU competition law's epistemic community.

Type: Article
Title: EU Competition Law as Responsive Law
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1017/cel.2021.9
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2021.9
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10197421
Downloads since deposit
Loading...
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Loading...
Download activity - last 12 months
Loading...
Downloads by country - last 12 months
1.United Kingdom
5
2.Germany
3
3.China
2
4.Netherlands
2
5.Finland
1
6.Taiwan
1
7.Greece
1
8.Romania
1
9.Belgium
1
10.United States
1

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item