UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

What limits improper bike-sharing parking most: Penalties or incentives? Findings from an online behavioral experiment

Si, H; Liang, J; Ke, J; Cheng, L; De Vos, J; (2024) What limits improper bike-sharing parking most: Penalties or incentives? Findings from an online behavioral experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour , 107 pp. 133-148. 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.001.

[thumbnail of De Vos_What limits improper bike-sharing parking most- Penalties or incentives_AAM.pdf] Text
De Vos_What limits improper bike-sharing parking most- Penalties or incentives_AAM.pdf
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 6 September 2025.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Electronic fences are now used to regulate the parking behavior of bike-sharing users, but the issue of improper parking within such fenced areas has not been resolved. Based on the theories of perceived value and perceived risk, this study used online behavioral experiments to simulate a scenario of users parking shared bicycles. By considering three factors — economic incentives, punitive measures, and travel scenarios — this study examined variations in users’ willingness to standardize the parking of shared bicycles. Data from 809 valid questionnaires were collected and empirically analyzed using bootstrap and regression analyses. According to the results, both economic incentives and penalties significantly enhanced users’ willingness to standardize the parking of shared bicycles, and the impact of penalties was slightly stronger than that of incentives. Perceived value played a mediating role between economic incentives and users’ willingness to properly park shared bicycles. Perceived risk acted as a mediator between punitive measures and the regulated parking intention of users. Travel scenarios served as a moderating factor between penalties and users’ willingness to park shared bicycles in a compliant manner, with the users’ compliance willingness in non-commuting travel scenarios significantly surpassing that in commuting contexts. These findings enrich the knowledge of sustainable usage behaviors among bike-sharing users, providing insights for bike-sharing companies to manage user behavior. Based on these results, several policy recommendations aimed at guiding governments and companies in regulating electronic fences and user parking behaviors are proposed.

Type: Article
Title: What limits improper bike-sharing parking most: Penalties or incentives? Findings from an online behavioral experiment
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.001
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.001
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Keywords: Bike sharing, Parking behavior, Perceived value, Behavioral experiment
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > The Bartlett School of Planning
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10197340
Downloads since deposit
1Download
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item