UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Criminalisation theory as a theory of pro tanto criminal proscription

Dsouza, Mark; (2024) Criminalisation theory as a theory of pro tanto criminal proscription. Jurisprudence 10.1080/20403313.2024.2395203. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Dsouza_OA_Criminalisation theory as a theory of pro tanto criminal proscription.pdf]
Preview
Text
Dsouza_OA_Criminalisation theory as a theory of pro tanto criminal proscription.pdf

Download (875kB) | Preview

Abstract

Criminalisation theorists who try to explain when substantive criminal law may appropriately be deployed to shrink the scope of our presumptive initial liberty, often take their project as requiring them to identify the sorts of conduct for which may the state criminally convict. I argue that this is a mistake. While such theories of ‘convictability’ have their place, they do not completely explain the use of substantive criminal law to limit our presumptive initial liberty. Convictions ensue only after pleas of justification and excuse fail, but the substantive criminal law coercively limits liberty well before conviction, when it creates a pro tanto criminal proscription. Even those who can escape conviction by pleading a justificatory or excusatory defence were, in fact, subject to authoritative criminal law guidance proscribing (or sometimes, requiring) specified conduct. Although that guidance is sometimes trumped by the additional guidance contained in defences, it is not null and void, and it continues to have a liberty-limiting effect. In other words, substantive criminal law already shrinks our initial liberty by pro tanto criminally proscribing some conduct. Therefore, I argue that we also need a theory of criminalisation that addresses the appropriate domain of pro tanto criminal proscriptions.

Type: Article
Title: Criminalisation theory as a theory of pro tanto criminal proscription
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/20403313.2024.2395203
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2024.2395203
Language: English
Additional information: © The Author(s), 2025. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CC-BY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Criminalisation, pro tanto offence, criminal proscription, convictability, wrongfulness constraint
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10195940
Downloads since deposit
Loading...
6Downloads
Download activity - last month
Loading...
Download activity - last 12 months
Loading...
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Loading...

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item