Chen, Peng;
Wang, Wei;
Qian, Chong;
Cao, Mengqiu;
Yang, Tianren;
(2024)
Gravity-based models for evaluating urban park accessibility: Why does localized selection of attractiveness factors and travel modes matter?
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
, 51
(4)
pp. 904-922.
10.1177/23998083231206168.
Preview |
Text
FinalManuscript_July2024_UCLDiscovery_EPB.pdf - Accepted Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Gravity-based models have been extensively utilized in urban studies for measuring geographic disparities in access to urban parks over the past several decades. However, despite methodological advancements incorporating various aspects of accessibility, there has been limited focus on the impact of variable selection (e.g., attractiveness factors) and transport modes on accessibility evaluations. This study investigates the differences in gravity-based models for assessing park accessibility based on varying assumptions about attractiveness factors and travel impedance. Semi-structured interviews with local residents were conducted to identify the reasons for park visits in Shanghai. Our bivariate correlation analyses reveal that factors such as park openness and access to public transport were crucial, in addition to conventional factors identified in the literature (i.e., park size and driving accessibility). This insight led to the development of localized accessibility measurements that incorporate park inclusiveness (i.e., entrance fees and opening hours) and multimodal travel options (based on multinomial logistic mode choice models). The results indicate that the refined model produces lower and more varied accessibility levels, which can better capture accessibility gaps across different geographic contexts. This accurate and practical identification of accessibility gaps can assist local planners and decision-makers in formulating effective policies and strategies to promote equitable access to urban public parks.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Gravity-based models for evaluating urban park accessibility: Why does localized selection of attractiveness factors and travel modes matter? |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1177/23998083231206168 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23998083231206168 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | ACCESS, Accessibility, AREAS, ASSOCIATION, CITIES, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, Environmental Studies, EQUITY, Geography, gravity model, GREEN SPACE, HEALTH, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, multimodal mode choice, planning support systems, Public Administration, Regional & Urban Planning, Science & Technology, Social Sciences, SPATIAL ACCESSIBILITY, TIME, TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY, urban parks, Urban Studies |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > Bartlett School Env, Energy and Resources |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10195296 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |