Chatzopoulou, Despoina;
Jalal, Arif Hanafi Bin;
Stoyanov, Danail;
Marcus, Hani J;
Pandit, Anand S;
(2024)
Improving risk communication: a proof-of-concept randomised control trial assessing the impact of visual aids for neurosurgical consent.
Frontiers in Surgery
, 11
, Article 1361040. 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1361040.
Preview |
PDF
fsurg-11-1361040.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction Informed consent is a fundamental component in the work-up for surgical procedures. Statistical risk information pertaining to a procedure is by nature probabilistic and challenging to communicate, especially to those with poor numerical literacy. Visual aids and audio/video tools have previously been shown to improve patients' understanding of statistical information. In this study, we aimed to explore the impact of different methods of risk communication in healthy participants randomized to either undergo the consent process with visual aids or the standard consent process for lumbar puncture. Material and methods Healthy individuals above 18 years old were eligible. The exclusion criteria were prior experience of the procedure or relevant medical knowledge, lack of capacity to consent, underlying cognitive impairment and hospitalised individuals. After randomisation, both groups received identical medical information about the procedure of a lumbar puncture in a hypothetical clinical scenario via different means of consent. The control group underwent the standard consent process in current clinical practice (Consent Form 1 without any illustrative examples), whereas the intervention group received additional anatomy diagrams, the Paling Palette and the Paling perspective scale. Anonymised questionnaires were received to evaluate their perception of the procedure and its associated risks. Results Fifty-two individuals were eligible without statistically significant differences in age, sex, professional status and the familiarity of the procedure. Visual aids were noted to improve the confidence of participants to describe the risks by themselves (p = 0.009) and participants in the intervention group felt significantly less overwhelmed with medical information (p = 0.028). The enhanced consent process was found to be significantly more acceptable by participants (p = 0.03). There was a trend towards greater appropriateness (p = 0.06) and it appeared to have “good” usability (median SUS = 76.4), although this also did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06) Conclusion Visual aids could be an appropriate alternative method for medical consent without being inferior regarding the understanding of the procedure, its risks and its benefits. Future studies could possibly compare or incorporate multiple interventions to determine the most effective tools in a larger scale of population including patients as well as healthy individuals.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Improving risk communication: a proof-of-concept randomised control trial assessing the impact of visual aids for neurosurgical consent |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1361040 |
| Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1361040 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| Keywords: | Informed consent, patient communication aids, health literacy, visual aids, health numeracy |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10188515 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
