UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Pulpotomy for treatment of complicated crown fractures in permanent teeth: A systematic review

Donnelly, Aisling; Foschi, Federico; McCabe, Paul; Duncan, Henry F; (2022) Pulpotomy for treatment of complicated crown fractures in permanent teeth: A systematic review. International Endodontic Journal , 55 (4) pp. 290-311. 10.1111/iej.13690. Green open access

[thumbnail of Pulpotomy for treatment of complicated crown fractures in permanent teeth A systematic review.pdf]
Preview
Text
Pulpotomy for treatment of complicated crown fractures in permanent teeth A systematic review.pdf - Published Version

Download (516kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Consensus on the treatment of choice for complicated crown fractures of teeth is limited. Recent guidance recommends vital-pulp-therapy; however, the preferred type is not specified. Higher success rates for pulpotomy compared to pulp-capping have been documented, which suggests pulpotomy may be a preferable option for complicated crown-fractures. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the success rate of pulpotomy (partial and complete) on teeth that suffered complicated crown fractures. PARTICIPANTS: patients who have suffered a complicated crown fracture to an anterior permanent tooth. INTERVENTION: pulpotomy (partial or complete). Comparator: pulp-capping or root canal treatment. OUTCOME: combined clinical and radiographic success at or after 12 months. METHODS: A systematic literature using key search terms was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane-Central-Register-of-Controlled-Trials (CENTRAL) as well as a grey literature search from inception to May 2021 and without language restricted to English. Strict inclusion criteria were applied. A standardized tool with defined criteria to assess the risk of bias in each study was used. For non-randomized comparative trials, the Robins-I tool was used while the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for non-comparative non-randomized studies. RESULTS: Seven retrospective clinical studies were included. The studies reported high success rates for pulpotomy with overall success ranges for partial or complete pulpotomy ranging from 75% to 96%. One study compared the success rates of pulpotomy to an alternative treatment option pulp capping (90.9% vs. 67%, respectively). Due to the lack of homogeneity in the included studies, a meta-analysis was not possible. DISCUSSION: This review highlights the limited evidence based for the current guidance on treatment of complicated crown fractures. The findings of the review indicate high success rates for pulpotomy; however, there is a moderate risk of bias and small sample sizes in the included studies with the result that the overall results should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this review, the benefits and high success rates reported for partial pulpotomy suggest this procedure, rather than pulp-capping, should be considered as the treatment of choice for both immature and mature teeth that have suffered complicated crown-fractures.

Type: Article
Title: Pulpotomy for treatment of complicated crown fractures in permanent teeth: A systematic review
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/iej.13690
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13690
Language: English
Additional information: © 2022 The Authors. International Endodontic Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Endodontic Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Keywords: complicated crown fractures, dental trauma, follow-up, pulp exposure, pulpotomy, vital pulp therapy, Crowns, Dental Pulp Capping, Dentition, Permanent, Humans, Pulpotomy, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute > Restorative Dental Sciences
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10188466
Downloads since deposit
19Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item