UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A comparative synthesis of UK mathematics education research: what are we talking about and do we align with international discourse?

Marks, Rachel; Foster, Colin; Barclay, Nancy; Barnes, Alison; Treacy, Páraic; (2021) A comparative synthesis of UK mathematics education research: what are we talking about and do we align with international discourse? Research in Mathematics Education , 23 (1) pp. 39-62. 10.1080/14794802.2020.1725612. Green open access

[thumbnail of Marks_Final author manuscript.pdf]
Preview
Text
Marks_Final author manuscript.pdf

Download (755kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper makes an important and original contribution to the updating of methodological approaches to research syntheses. We analysed all 813 Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics from 2003 to 2018, first using a quantitative corpus-survey and qualitative thematic coding and, again, independently, using topic modelling. We found strong convergence between findings from the different methods. We compare our findings to those from an earlier Proceedings review (1995–2002) and to a recent review of the corpus of publications in the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education and Educational Studies in Mathematics, as well as to a review by the European Society for Research into Learning Mathematics and several other reviews. We found considerable similarity between the issues discussed, and similar trends over time. We conclude that the efficiency of topic modelling makes it a powerful option to include among a range of methodological approaches to research review.

Type: Article
Title: A comparative synthesis of UK mathematics education research: what are we talking about and do we align with international discourse?
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/14794802.2020.1725612
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1725612
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author-accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Mathematics education review, mixed methods, topic modelling
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10186952
Downloads since deposit
17Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item