UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Community imaginaries, participation and acceptance of renewable energy projects – substituting the quicksand of development with rocky fundamentals

Tsoeu-Ntokoane, Seroala; Mosabala, Thuso Donald; Kali, Moeketsi; Lemaire, Xavier; (2024) Community imaginaries, participation and acceptance of renewable energy projects – substituting the quicksand of development with rocky fundamentals. Cogent Social Sciences , 10 (1) , Article 2292755. 10.1080/23311886.2023.2292755. Green open access

[thumbnail of Tsoeu-Ntokoane & al. 2024 Community_imaginaries_participation_and_acceptance.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Tsoeu-Ntokoane & al. 2024 Community_imaginaries_participation_and_acceptance.pdf - Published Version

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract

Community participation could contribute to sustaining energy projects, however some projects underestimate the value of meaningful project host communities’ involvement in decision-making. Rural community energy development projects in Lesotho often assume a top-down development-driven approach void of communities’ perspectives and desires. This study investigates opportunities Lesotho’s renewable energy projects, either led by communities or the government, provide. The authors draw from qualitative research to examine two cases, Semonkong and Motete’s participatory approaches. This study determined the magnitude of community participation in the two projects, from their initiation to the level of community participation in decision-making and implementation. The findings posit that community participation in both projects differs from minimal to no participation. They further revealed a blurry picture of community acceptance of the project where participation was relatively lower, thus bringing project sustainability into question. The Lesotho Electric Company deprived the Semonkong community the opportunity to participate in the decisions of the Semonkong mini-grid. In contrast, the Motete project consortium allowed a modicum of community participation hence higher social acceptance prospects. The study revealed that tensions, conflicts, and protests are implications associated with lack of community participation in the project of Semonkong. The sustainability of projects is dependent on the extent of the host communities’ involvement, acceptance, and trust. This study recommends community engagement for hammering and forging project acceptability and sustainability.

Type: Article
Title: Community imaginaries, participation and acceptance of renewable energy projects – substituting the quicksand of development with rocky fundamentals
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2292755
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2292755
Language: English
Additional information: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: project acceptability; community participation; imaginaries of development; decentralised renewable energy; Lesotho; rural electrification; mini-grids
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > Bartlett School Env, Energy and Resources
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10185442
Downloads since deposit
43Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item