UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Are mammography image acquisition factors, compression pressure and paddle tilt, associated with breast cancer detection in screening?

Hudson, SM; Wilkinson, LS; DE STAVOLA, BL; Dos-Santos-Silva, I; (2023) Are mammography image acquisition factors, compression pressure and paddle tilt, associated with breast cancer detection in screening? British Journal of Radiology , 96 (1150) 10.1259/bjr.20230085. Green open access

[thumbnail of hudson-et-al-2023-are-mammography-image-acquisition-factors-compression-pressure-and-paddle-tilt-associated-with-breast.pdf]
Preview
PDF
hudson-et-al-2023-are-mammography-image-acquisition-factors-compression-pressure-and-paddle-tilt-associated-with-breast.pdf - Published Version

Download (330kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the associations between objectively measured mammographic compression pressure and paddle tilt and breast cancer (BC) detected at the same (“contemporaneous”) screen, subsequent screens, or in-between screens (interval cancers). Methods: Automated pressure and paddle tilt estimates were derived for 80,495 mammographic examina-tions in a UK population-based screening programme. Adjusted logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the associations of compression parameters with BC detected at contemporaneous screen (777 cases). Nested case-control designs were used to estimate associations of pressure and tilt with: (a) interval cancer (148 cases/625 age-matched controls) and (b) subsequent screen-detected cancer (344/1436), via condi-tional logistic regression. Results: Compression pressure was negatively associated with odds of BC at contemporaneous screen (odds ratio (OR) for top versus bottom third of the pressure distribution: 0.74; 95% CI 0.60, 0.92; P-for-linear-trend (Pt) = 0.007). There was weak evidence that moderate pressure at screening was associated with lower odds of interval cancer (OR for middle versus bottom third: 0.63; 95% CI 0.38, 1.05; p = 0.079), but no association was found between pressure and the odds of BC at subsequent screen. There was no evidence that paddle tilt was associated with the odds of contemporaneous, subsequent screen or interval cancer detection. Conclusions: Findings are consistent with compression pressure, but not paddle tilt, affecting the performance of mammographic screening by interfering with its ability to detect cancers. Advances in knowledge: Inadequate or excessive compression pressure at screening may contribute to a reduced ability to detect cancers, resulting in a greater number of interval cancer cases.

Type: Article
Title: Are mammography image acquisition factors, compression pressure and paddle tilt, associated with breast cancer detection in screening?
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230085
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230085
Language: English
Additional information: © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10179921
Downloads since deposit
10Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item