UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Review of the Literature

Taimeh, Dina; Ni Riordain, Richeal; Fedele, Stefano; Leeson, Rachel; (2023) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache , 37 (2) pp. 113-129. 10.11607/ofph.3264. Green open access

[thumbnail of Leeson_Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used in temporomandibular disorders. A review of the literature._.pdf]
Preview
Text
Leeson_Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used in temporomandibular disorders. A review of the literature._.pdf

Download (484kB) | Preview

Abstract

AIMS: To identify the range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in TMD studies, summarize the available evidence for their psychometric properties, and provide guidance for the selection of such measures. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to retrieve articles published between 2009 and 2018 containing a patient-reported measure of the effects of TMDs. Three databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. RESULTS: A total of 517 articles containing at least one PROM were included in the review, and 57 additional studies were also located describing the psychometric properties of some tools in a TMD population. A total of 106 PROMs were identified and fell into the following categories: PROMs describing the severity of symptoms; PROMs describing psychologic status; and PROMs describing quality of life and general health. The most commonly used PROM was the visual analog scale. However, a wide range of verbal descriptors was employed. The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 and Beck Depression Inventory were the most commonly used PROMs describing the effect of TMDs on quality of life and psychologic status, respectively. Additionally, the Oral Health Impact Profile (various versions) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria Axis ll questionnaires were the instruments most repeatedly tested in a TMD population, and these instruments have undergone cross-cultural validation in several languages. CONCLUSION: A wide range of PROMs have been used to describe the impact of TMDs on patients. Such variability may limit the ability of researchers and clinicians to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments and make meaningful comparisons.

Type: Article
Title: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Review of the Literature
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.11607/ofph.3264
Publisher version: https://www.quintpub.com/journals/ofph/abstract.ph...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Databases, Factual, Humans, Language, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Quality of Life, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10178383
Downloads since deposit
36Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item